GO2-Grid System

 

Grid Operation

Part 2

Grid System

Better Start With PART-1

Standalone systems were small and unstable as expansion was limited to local load only. But transformer changed the scenario. Current for specified load is inversely proportional to the operating voltage. Power loss on line is proportional to square of the current and voltage drop on line is also proportional to line current. So power loss and voltage drop problem can be solved by sending power at high voltage. It was possible to change voltage as required by transformer. Also voltage at receiving end can be adjusted as required by transformer tapping. So feeding loads at faraway become practically feasible without any technical hitch. Sending end voltage was raised by step up transformer and power transmitted to faraway loads at high voltage. Receiving end voltage again reduced by step down transformer as required and fed to the loads. In this way third element Transmission was added in power system and systems expansion started.

Parallel operation of generators at different location also became feasible by interconnection of such expanded systems. It was a step toward grid formation and thereafter more and more generating stations and load centers were integrated to form large grid systems and ultimately forming state grid. During the process individual licenses were discouraged and extinguished. State electricity board emerged as single license for the state. It was transformation from private sector to public sector.  State electricity board became the single largest licensee for the state with state grid. Occasionally, this is referred as vertical integration of power systems. Power plants were demarcated as base load stations and peaking stations for regulating generation with the load. Cheap power plants included in base load group and costlier power plants in peaking group for optimum economic operation. Accordingly peaking stations were operated for regulation with active governor mode whereas base load stations were operated with full load.

Review of water supply system with multiple in/out flows

Some modification is done. One incoming line with control valve CGB and one out going line with control valve CLB are added as in the figure. Inflow through valve CGA is 40 liters per minute and out flow through valve CLA is also 40 liters per minute as before. Inflow in new line through valve CGB is adjusted to 50 liters per minute and outflow in new line through valve CLB is also adjusted to 50 liters per minute. Tank water level remains at 50% as total inflow equals total outflow.

Now let outflow increased to 45 liters per minute by opening valve CLA. Now total inflow is 40+50=90 liters per minute whereas total outflow is 45+50=95 liters per minute. So there is shortage of 95-90=5 liters per minute. Hence water level of the tank starts dropping. Consequently head HG will increase and inflow from CGA as well CGB also increase to 40+d and 50+d respectively. So also head HL will decrease and outflow from CLA as well CLB also decrease to 45-d and 50-d respectively. This will continue till total inflow and total outflow match. Thereafter it will be stable with water at that lower level.

Water level had dropped also but drop is smaller than earlier with single inflow and single outflow lines. But now drop in level and change in head is effective to both inflows and both outflows. So the corrective action is almost double. If there were multiple inflow lines and multiple outflow lines, corrective action would be very fast and level drop is very small. This will happen in any case of load adding/tripping or generation adding/tripping.

Power system also has similar effect. Grid system has better control on frequency as compare to standalone system. Frequency may drop due to addition of load anywhere in the system. But frequency drop activates all the generators in the system to pickup generation. Similarly power demand by all the loads in the system drops according to their response index. Ultimately drop in frequency is very fast and very small as compared to standalone system as hereunder in the chart. Stiffness of the system is better with larger grid.

Broken lines represent condition of standalone system. System may stabilize at N’ after increase in load from DO to DX and frequency drops from FO to F’N.  Solid lines represent condition in grid mode. System stabilize at N after increase in load from DO to Dand frequency drops from FO to FN. Slop of generation line and demand line is high due to multiple corrective responses in grid mode.  Hence frequency drop is small and fast.  

Advantage of grid mode

Higher System Bias --> Frequency Deviation is Restricted

Frequency changes when there is mismatch in power generation and demand

Change in frequency = Unbalance in load and generation / System bias

Higher the system bias smaller is the change in frequency for the same unbalance.

Similarly

For linear motion, Force F = mass × acceleration = m × dv/dt

For angular motion, Force F = Moment of Inertia × dω/dt

Frequency is angular velocity of electricity.

Unbalance in load and generation is operating force

Unbalance = df/dt × System Inertia.

But the unbalance is reducing due to rise in generation and drop in demand with drop in frequency.

So df/dt, the rate of change of frequency is also reducing tending to zero as under








Higher the System Inertia.--> Slower the Frequency Variation

Slow variation in frequency has scope for corrective action.

Synchronous grid system has major advantage that load anywhere in the system can be met by generation anywhere in the system. This enables system to operate at most economical way by merit order generation scheduling. Of course care has to be taken for system losses and network constraint.

Grid mode frequency control criteria.

Power injection PI = Power generated by generator – auxiliary consumption.

Gross Load GL = Power Demand by active loads in the system including system losses.

Unbalance = Net injection – Gross Load.

Frequency is normal and steady when Unbalance is zero.

Frequency increase when Unbalance is positive.

Frequency decrease when Unbalance is negative.

Grid system has advantage of increased stability due to high inertia and high bias.  Also has flexibility of meeting load at anywhere with merit order generation from anywhere. But it is hard to envisage power flow in the network being complex phenomenon. Load flow study may be useful for operation planning and strengthening network with development. Fault level at some bus may increase with addition of strong lines and bulk power sources. This may need review and augmentation of switchgear where required. Risk of occurrence in any part may spread in the synchronous grid. Proper islanding system is required to avoid this.

  Part-3